Engagement Model

Wie wir uns engagieren

A product ladder calibrated to the structural decision the client faces. Three measurement instruments. Each producing a clear structural decision basis – not recommendations for further study.

Every Supply Chain Navigators engagement is principal-led. Simon Dahlem is present at board and C-level throughout. Specialist delivery teams operate under direct principal oversight. The advisory and the delivery are never decoupled.

All engagements are confidential and executive-sponsored. We do not resell systems, represent vendors or accept referral arrangements with technology providers.

Five rungs. Calibrated to the decision the client faces.

Engagements are organised as a product ladder. Each rung is a complete piece of work in its own right – clients enter at the rung that matches their structural question, not at a fixed entry point.

Sprosse 0

3 to 6 weeks

KOMPASS IPI

What it answers: 

Is the Management Burden of the deployed infrastructure matched by the governance maturity available to absorb it?

Standalone Infrastructure Performance Index assessment – the Operational Complexity Score. Suitable for pre-investment evaluation, capital reinvestment decisions, or environments where infrastructure-governance fit is the specific question. Produces the COMPASS IPI™ report with its three metrics – Management Burden (MB), Structural Risk Index (SRI) and Governance Maturity Index (GMI).

Rang 1

10 days

KOMPASS Basislinie

What it answers: 

What is the structural starting point of this environment, expressed as a board-ready alignment score?

Ten-day diagnostic across all three vertices. Establishes a baseline COMPASS Index™. Suitable for initial structural assessment where speed and decision-readiness matter – particularly post-acquisition, pre-transformation, or at leadership transition.

Sprosse 2

60 days

COMPASS Sprint

What it answers: 

What is the full structural picture, with detailed drift register and root cause analysis?

Full instrument deployment across COMPASS IPI™, COMPASS GMI™ and COMPASS ROI™. Detailed drift register ranked by financial exposure. Root cause analysis across all three vertices. Executive decision brief, board-ready.

Stufe 3

3 to 9 months, scope-defined

COMPASS Neuausrichtung

What it answers: 

What does it take to realign this environment structurally, and what is the EBITDA recovery trajectory?

Where structural drift is confirmed, SCN leads the realignment programme. Hands-on delivery under principal oversight – not a consultancy report handed to an internal team. All three vertices addressed in structured sequence with defined milestones. COMPASS ROI runs throughout as the lifecycle benefit tracking instrument.

Rung 4 & 5

Retained, typically annual

Deal-Lebenszyklus & Honorar

What it answers: 

How is structural integrity maintained across the full investment lifecycle or the PE hold period?

Retained advisory at board and C-level across the investment hold period or the PE deal lifecycle. Periodic COMPASS Index reviews. COMPASS ROI updated with annual actual figures. Ongoing structural governance support where the organisation does not yet have that discipline in place. Pre-exit preparation where applicable.

Three instruments measuring three vertices

Each engagement deploys one or more of the three measurement instruments. The instruments compose into the COMPASS Index but can also be deployed independently when a specific structural question dominates.

 

KOMPASS IPI

Systemscheitelpunkt

Measures

Operational complexity – Management Burden against governance maturity

Output

Three metrics – Management Burden (MB), Structural Risk Index (SRI), Governance Maturity Index (GMI) – plus one of seven analytical patterns, IPI report and executive brief

Standalone duration

3 to 6 weeks

COMPASS GMI

Governance-Scheitelpunkt

Measures

Governance capability across twelve dimensions, five-level maturity scale

Output

Governance Maturity Index, dimension gap register and governance development plan

Standalone duration

2 to 4 weeks

COMPASS ROI

Governance-Scheitelpunkt

Measures

Investment case assumptions against actual benefit delivery, across the full asset lifecycle

Output

Benefit Realisation Register, Investment Curve Analysis and Capital Vertex Score

Standalone duration

4 to 8 weeks

How we work

Principal-led throughout

Simon Dahlem leads every engagement at board and C-level from day one. We do not send a team and report back. The principal is present.

Technologieunabhängig

We do not resell systems, represent vendors or hold referral arrangements with technology providers. Our assessment of any WMS, automation or ERP environment is structurally independent. This is a precondition of credible structural governance assessment – not a marketing claim.

Confidential by default

All engagements are conducted under strict confidentiality. We do not reference client engagements without explicit permission. The case studies on this site are published with client agreement.

Time-bound and structured

Engagements are scoped, time-bound and produce defined outputs. We do not engage in open-ended advisory relationships without a clear structural mandate and defined deliverables.

Decision-ready outputs

Every engagement produces a clear structural decision basis – not a report that requires a further engagement to interpret. The COMPASS Index, the drift register and the executive brief are designed to be presented at board level without translation.

No conflict of interest

We do not accept work from technology vendors, system integrators or implementation firms. Our only commercial relationship is with the executive team or ownership structure that commissions the engagement..

Methodologie-versioniert

Every assessment carries the methodology version stamp. Outputs remain comparable across engagements as calibration refines through field experience. The instruments improve with use; outputs remain defensible at peer review.

Arbeiten Sie mit Supply Chain Navigators zusammen

Wenn Sie für eine kapitalintensive Distributionsumgebung verantwortlich sind, in der die Beziehung zwischen der ursprünglichen Investitionslogik und der aktuellen operativen Realität eine Überlegung wert ist – genau dort arbeiten wir.